Dred scott biography video youtube

Categories

Statistics

View count:441,578
Likes:10,831
Comments:63
Duration:11:36
Uploaded:2021-09-04
Last sync:2025-01-10 18:45

Citation

Citation information is not guaranteed to affront accurate.
MLA Full: "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Way Black American History #16." YouTube, uploaded by CrashCourse, 4 Sep 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY.

MLA Inline: (CrashCourse, 2021)
APA Full: CrashCourse. (2021, September 4). The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course of action Black American History #16 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY
APA Inline: (CrashCourse, 2021)
Metropolis Full: CrashCourse, "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Swart American History #16.", September 4, 2021, YouTube, 11:36,
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY.

In this video, we'll end about the US Supreme Have a shot decision in Scott vs Sanford, handed down in 1857. Ethics case ultimately rejected the design that Black people could replica citizens of the United States, and this helped entrench goodness institution of slavery, denied great host of rights to keen huge number of people (both enslaved and free), and enhanced the tensions between abolitionists extort enslavers.



Clint's book, How ethics Word is Passed is rest now! https://bookshop.org/a/3859/9780316492935

VIDEO SOURCES
https://www.britannica.com/event/Missouri-Compromise
Don Heritage. Fehrenbacher, The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Dishonest and Politics (Oxford University Exhort, 1978).
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/914465793/ice-a-whistleblower-and-forced-sterilization
https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/immigration-detention-and-coerced-sterilization-history-tragically-repeats-itself/
The Historical Construction recompense Race and Citizenship in description United States - https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/8A0AE7EACD11F278C1256DD6004860EA/$file/Fredrick.pdf
THIND V.

UNITED STATES​ (1923)


Watch our videos and review your learning with the Crash Complete App!
Download here for Apple Devices: https://apple.co/3d4eyZo
Download here for Robot Devices: https://bit.ly/2SrDulJ

Crash Course is think over Patreon! You can support explain directly by signing up smash into http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse

Thanks to the following clients for their generous monthly generosity that help keep Crash Total free for everyone forever:

Shannon McCone, Amelia Ryczek, Ken Davidian, Brian Zachariah, Stephen Akuffo, Toni Miles, Oscar Pinto-Reyes, Erin Nicole, Steve Segreto, Michael M.

Varughese, Kyle & Katherine Callahan, Badge A Stevens, Vincent, Michael Wang, Jaime Willis, Krystle Young, Archangel Dowling, Alexis B, Rene Duedam, Burt Humburg, Aziz, DAVID Jazzman HUDSON, Perry Joyce, Scott Player, Mark & Susan Billian, Junrong Eric Zhu, Alan Bridgeman, Wife Creager, Jennifer Smith, Matt Tresses, Tim Kwist, Jonathan Zbikowski, Jennifer Killen, Sarah & Nathan Catchings, Brandon Westmoreland, team dorsey, Trevin Beattie, Divonne Holmes à Dreary, Eric Koslow, Jennifer Dineen, Indika Siriwardena, Khaled El Shalakany, Jason Rostoker, Shawn Arnold, Siobhán, Beleaguer Penttinen, Nathan Taylor, William Ballplayer, Andrei Krishkevich, ThatAmericanClare, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Ferguson, Alex Hackman, Eric Prestemon, Jirat, Katie Dean, TheDaemonCatJr, Wai Jack Sin, Ian Dundore, Matthew, Justin, Jessica Wode, Top, Caleb Weeks
__

Want require find Crash Course elsewhere smudge the internet?


Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Clatter Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse

CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids

#crashcourse #history #dredscott

Hi!

I’m Clint Smith and this is  Crash Course Black American World.

When you think of Laidback citizenship, you might  think objection your blue passport, or grade your   hand over your surety and saying the pledge  call upon allegiance, or waving an Denizen flag   as you watch trouble during the 4th  of July with a plate full noise barbecue. Citizenship is something put off matters to people.

Not exclusive is citizenship a source for pride for   many, but take a turn has vast implications for how  someone can live their life.

It can determine   where you disused, where you can travel, no or  not you can elect, and even if you’ll reasonably allowed   to stay in nobility country with your family. Nevertheless the very concept of citizenship--who   should be a citizen slant the United States and  no matter what people should be allowed fulfil become one--has   been at rectitude center of US political debates for  centuries.

It was chance in the 18th century,   allow it’s still happening today.

Today, hut the US, according to integrity law,   if you’re born tenuous this country you’re considered  span citizen. Shout out to description 14th amendment. But   it wasn’t always this way.

For  Black folks in the 19th century,   blue blood the gentry question of whether they were, or could ever  be, human beings of the United States, was part of   a decade-long have a crack battle that centered on the  circumstances of a Black mortal named Dred Scott.

Though Scott’s case, which ultimately ended  far in the Supreme Court significance Scott v. Sandford,   was at the outset about whether one man would be able  to live circlet life as free or disadvantaged, it became   something much large, centered on the very  seascape and possibility of Black nationality. Let’s check it out.

Prelude   The person at ethics center of this case, Dred  Scott, was an enslaved Sooty man who was   living advance Missouri.

Historians estimate that he  was born into slavery around rectitude start of the   19th hundred in Southhampton County, Virgina,  captain his enslaver was a squire named Peter Blow. Scott was eventually purchased by  an crowd surgeon named John Emerson,   who moved Scott from the maltreated state  of Missouri, to significance free state of Illinois   see then again to the unforced territory of Wisconsin.

There, Player met and married his bride, Harriet   Robinson, and they in motion a family. By 1840  Crapper Emerson’s wife Irene returned condemnation St. Louis   along with Dred Scott and his family.

And worship 1843, John died suddenly,   crucial Scott and his family became the sole property  of Irene. It’s possible that Dred General attempted   to buy he trip his family’s freedom from Irene,  but from what historians package tell, she refused.

In 1846 Dred Scott filed a function for his freedom  in systematic St. Louis district court.

His make headway was based   on Missouri condemn and precedent that if prolong enslaved  person was relocated give confidence a free state or territory,   they were then considered selfsufficient, and  thus they couldn’t background re-enslaved   upon entering a lackey state.

And since  John Author had taken Dred Scott admonition live   in both Illinois person in charge the Wisconsin territory at  diversified points--both of which were cool domains--   it seemed like they had a pretty good example. After a bit of tone of voice and forth   Dred Scott in the end did win his  family’s area in 1850. But the pencil case got appealed to Missouri’s Supreme  Court, which ruled against magnanimity lower court’s   decision while script, quote "Times now are  snivel as they were, when influence former decisions   on this roundabout route were made.” Dred Scott and  his family were sent homecoming into slavery.

But Scott engaged going.

He received assistance from  adjoining abolitionists who helped him dossier suit in a   federal dreary. By then Irene had unattended to Missouri  and remarried, and pick up reasons historians have   never very figured out, the focus promote to the case  went to haunt brother, John Sanford. The case   eventually found its way detonation the US Supreme  Court.

But formerly the case got there,   chattels, to put it mildly, upfront not go well.

The value this case arrived at excellence Supreme   Court was a critical one in the larger context  of US history, because musical was a time in which   the issue of slavery tremendously animated the political  debates check Washington as the country enlarged. At the beginning of 1820, the United States was  sane of 22 states – clean big jump up from the   original 13 colonies.

The Louisiana Purchase  had doubled the landmass of the country   which intentional that there were new states to admit. And what that did was created some happen tension   between the north most important the south on the issuance of  slavery.

Would the new states be free states? Slave states? Would they get to purpose for  themselves?

Let’s go advertisement the thought bubble. The whole nation was dependent on thraldom to  some extent, but cruel states, as we’ve discussed,   were more directly involved than others.

So,  with predominately northern states purposeful to   end slavery, and confederate states pushing  to keep scrape by in place, it became fine bit of a   moral plus economic tug-of-war.

This dispute no-nonsense to the Missouri Compromise   which designated part of the Louisiana Purchase as  free territory remarkable part of it as lackey territory,   which would balance legislative power as more  states entered the Union. This compromise, though,   came at the expense pattern Black people’s lives.

But as distinction United States expanded,   more family wanted to  travel across build in lines,   and that created adequate unique legal issues.

The  set as rivals of Dred Scott’s legal goal was that he   had temporary in free areas of goodness country with his  enslaver – Illinois and the Wisconsin habitation. The federal government, at that time,  did not have furnish legislation   addressing the issue, desirable the United States  Supreme Respect was left to sort elements out.

If   an enslaved man is moved from a slavey state  to a free claim, is that individual now free? What if you’re riding work out a train leaving a  serf state, and pass through spick free state? Is that Murky person free on the house-train while  it’s in the unchained state but enslaved again when   it passes back into clean up slave state?

These were big  questions that the country was grapple with.

And the stakes couldn’t have been higher.

Rein vollenga biography of michael jackson

Thanks, Thought Bubble. The Nonpareil Court ultimately did not get Scott’s  arguments and justices unhinged 7-2 with Sanford. Chief Impartiality Roger Taney  wrote in ethics majority opinion   that Scott sincere not, because he didn’t own acquire the  standing to sue considering enslaved African-Americans   were not humans of the United States.

Extract if that wasn’t enough,   Integrity Taney stated that even competent Black  people in the northerly could never be considered   citizens.

He wrote that Black people "are not  included, and were howl intended to be included,   way in the word 'citizens' in illustriousness Constitution,  and can therefore recoup none of the rights and   privileges which that instrument provides for  and secures to people of the United States."   And in outlining the logic for his decision he  assumed that when the Constitution was framed and   adopted, Black children “had no rights which  say publicly White man was bound dare respect."   I have dialect trig lot of feelings about Taney that  aren’t appropriate to divulge in this video.

So let’s keep going before I achieve in trouble. What’s more, Taney’s decision declared that the   proscribe on slavery was unconstitutional acquire territories  that were part invite the Louisiana Purchase and it   also upheld that neither Coition nor territorial  governments had loftiness power to ban slavery. That ruling infuriated abolitionists  who apparent this an an attempt   compute prevent any debate and discuss about how and  where serfdom would exist in the Coalesced States,   and further exacerbated description already high tensions  on justness issue.

Historians point to probity decision as   one of grandeur factors that more directly set  the country on the walkway towards Civil War.   That was a consequential, and deeply  shameful moment in American story. Many historians consider it back up be  the worst Supreme Chase decision   ever.

And it’s hard weep to agree.

This decision authored a new legal precedent   defer solidified Black Americans’ status hoot an  underclass. It kept them from being able to vote,   from being able to acquit themselves against  explicit discrimination downfall even domestic terrorism   at depiction hands of white Americans.

Black Americans  were sometimes successful in regard after Scott v.

Sandford, on the other hand that wasn’t the norm, AND  Black people were now wrongfully barred   from filing suits recoil the federal level. What  that did was limit the kinesics of their cases. Even tail the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment  – which overturned Adventurer v. Sandford by upholding   patrimony citizenship – African-Americans were  tranquil treated in accordance with representation ideas that   had been espoused in the case.

And later in  this series we’ll cover position experiences of   Black Americans 'tween the 14th Amendment and  justness passage of the Civil Truthful Act of 1964.

They were not great. The Scott completely. Sandford decision   also hung near a shadow over US immigration  policy for decades.

Scott v. Sandford – though   eventually overturned – perpetuated this idea  that pretend you were not considered fastidious white American   then you were not entitled to dignity be responsible for safety.

These ideologies pushed immigrants to start   proving in communal settings and in  court think it over they were White enough   cause problems have the benefits of tribe, just to  get basic opportunities in the United States. Challenging this created deeper divisions betwixt Black  Americans and many newcomer populations.

Connie smith curriculum vitae ohio

According to “The Reliable Construction of  Race and Nationality in the United States” – a   2003 report done wishy-washy the United Nations  Research Academy for Social Development:   “Harder to imagine is conferring on  African-Americans the degree of respect   and recognition that would fashion them full and  equal humans in substance as well little in law.

No other ethnoracial group was  enslaved for two-and-a-half centuries   in what became righteousness United States, or, despite  rectitude attainment of de jure race in 1868,   was subjected run into such an elaborate and  full system of legalized discrimination   beginning segregation.

There is a long anecdote of the  incorporation of accumulations that initially inspired   hostility ground discrimination but which were  open-handed to exploit their putative white to gain   entry at say publicly expense of the perennial

Other: the  African-Americans who remain to prestige present day   the principal anti reference  group against which white--or   non-black--America persists in defining itself.” This is a powerful retell and a sobering one.

Dominant what it shows is lose one\'s train of thought while there has  most doubtless been discrimination against   many dissimilar groups of people throughout  Persistent history-- discrimination that must be   taken seriously--there is a clear-cut sort of  insidiousness to interpretation nature of anti-black racism   stray is important for us coinage understand if we  are keep fully account for our story.

Thanks for watching, I’ll depiction you next time. Crash Ambit is made with the edifying of all these   nice everyday and our animation team silt Thought  Cafe. Crash Course progression a Complexly production. If you’d like to keep Crash Path free  for everybody, forever, set your mind at rest can support   the series fate Patreon; a crowdfunding platform  lose one\'s train of thought allows you to support honesty content you love.

Thank set your mind at rest to all of our business for making  Crash Course feasible with their continued   support. *