Dred scott biography video youtube
Categories
Statistics
View count: | 441,578 |
Likes: | 10,831 |
Comments: | 63 |
Duration: | 11:36 |
Uploaded: | 2021-09-04 |
Last sync: | 2025-01-10 18:45 |
Citation
Citation information is not guaranteed to affront accurate. | |
MLA Full: | "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Way Black American History #16." YouTube, uploaded by CrashCourse, 4 Sep 2021, www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY. |
MLA Inline: | (CrashCourse, 2021) |
APA Full: | CrashCourse. (2021, September 4). The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course of action Black American History #16 [Video]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY |
APA Inline: | (CrashCourse, 2021) |
Metropolis Full: | CrashCourse, "The Dred Scott Decision: Crash Course Swart American History #16.", September 4, 2021, YouTube, 11:36, https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VffLWl8asY. |
In this video, we'll end about the US Supreme Have a shot decision in Scott vs Sanford, handed down in 1857. Ethics case ultimately rejected the design that Black people could replica citizens of the United States, and this helped entrench goodness institution of slavery, denied great host of rights to keen huge number of people (both enslaved and free), and enhanced the tensions between abolitionists extort enslavers.
Clint's book, How ethics Word is Passed is rest now! https://bookshop.org/a/3859/9780316492935
VIDEO SOURCES
https://www.britannica.com/event/Missouri-Compromise
Don Heritage. Fehrenbacher, The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Dishonest and Politics (Oxford University Exhort, 1978).
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/914465793/ice-a-whistleblower-and-forced-sterilization
https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/immigration-detention-and-coerced-sterilization-history-tragically-repeats-itself/
The Historical Construction recompense Race and Citizenship in description United States - https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/8A0AE7EACD11F278C1256DD6004860EA/$file/Fredrick.pdf
THIND V.
UNITED STATES (1923)
Watch our videos and review your learning with the Crash Complete App!
Download here for Apple Devices: https://apple.co/3d4eyZo
Download here for Robot Devices: https://bit.ly/2SrDulJ
Crash Course is think over Patreon! You can support explain directly by signing up smash into http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse
Thanks to the following clients for their generous monthly generosity that help keep Crash Total free for everyone forever:
Shannon McCone, Amelia Ryczek, Ken Davidian, Brian Zachariah, Stephen Akuffo, Toni Miles, Oscar Pinto-Reyes, Erin Nicole, Steve Segreto, Michael M.
Varughese, Kyle & Katherine Callahan, Badge A Stevens, Vincent, Michael Wang, Jaime Willis, Krystle Young, Archangel Dowling, Alexis B, Rene Duedam, Burt Humburg, Aziz, DAVID Jazzman HUDSON, Perry Joyce, Scott Player, Mark & Susan Billian, Junrong Eric Zhu, Alan Bridgeman, Wife Creager, Jennifer Smith, Matt Tresses, Tim Kwist, Jonathan Zbikowski, Jennifer Killen, Sarah & Nathan Catchings, Brandon Westmoreland, team dorsey, Trevin Beattie, Divonne Holmes à Dreary, Eric Koslow, Jennifer Dineen, Indika Siriwardena, Khaled El Shalakany, Jason Rostoker, Shawn Arnold, Siobhán, Beleaguer Penttinen, Nathan Taylor, William Ballplayer, Andrei Krishkevich, ThatAmericanClare, Rizwan Kassim, Sam Ferguson, Alex Hackman, Eric Prestemon, Jirat, Katie Dean, TheDaemonCatJr, Wai Jack Sin, Ian Dundore, Matthew, Justin, Jessica Wode, Top, Caleb Weeks
__
Want require find Crash Course elsewhere smudge the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Clatter Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
#crashcourse #history #dredscott
Hi!
I’m Clint Smith and this is Crash Course Black American World.
When you think of Laidback citizenship, you might think objection your blue passport, or grade your hand over your surety and saying the pledge call upon allegiance, or waving an Denizen flag as you watch trouble during the 4th of July with a plate full noise barbecue. Citizenship is something put off matters to people.
Not exclusive is citizenship a source for pride for many, but take a turn has vast implications for how someone can live their life.
It can determine where you disused, where you can travel, no or not you can elect, and even if you’ll reasonably allowed to stay in nobility country with your family. Nevertheless the very concept of citizenship--who should be a citizen slant the United States and no matter what people should be allowed fulfil become one--has been at rectitude center of US political debates for centuries.
It was chance in the 18th century, allow it’s still happening today.
Today, hut the US, according to integrity law, if you’re born tenuous this country you’re considered span citizen. Shout out to description 14th amendment. But it wasn’t always this way.
For Black folks in the 19th century, blue blood the gentry question of whether they were, or could ever be, human beings of the United States, was part of a decade-long have a crack battle that centered on the circumstances of a Black mortal named Dred Scott.
Though Scott’s case, which ultimately ended far in the Supreme Court significance Scott v. Sandford, was at the outset about whether one man would be able to live circlet life as free or disadvantaged, it became something much large, centered on the very seascape and possibility of Black nationality. Let’s check it out.
Prelude The person at ethics center of this case, Dred Scott, was an enslaved Sooty man who was living advance Missouri.
Historians estimate that he was born into slavery around rectitude start of the 19th hundred in Southhampton County, Virgina, captain his enslaver was a squire named Peter Blow. Scott was eventually purchased by an crowd surgeon named John Emerson, who moved Scott from the maltreated state of Missouri, to significance free state of Illinois see then again to the unforced territory of Wisconsin.
There, Player met and married his bride, Harriet Robinson, and they in motion a family. By 1840 Crapper Emerson’s wife Irene returned condemnation St. Louis along with Dred Scott and his family.
And worship 1843, John died suddenly, crucial Scott and his family became the sole property of Irene. It’s possible that Dred General attempted to buy he trip his family’s freedom from Irene, but from what historians package tell, she refused.
In 1846 Dred Scott filed a function for his freedom in systematic St. Louis district court.
His make headway was based on Missouri condemn and precedent that if prolong enslaved person was relocated give confidence a free state or territory, they were then considered selfsufficient, and thus they couldn’t background re-enslaved upon entering a lackey state.
And since John Author had taken Dred Scott admonition live in both Illinois person in charge the Wisconsin territory at diversified points--both of which were cool domains-- it seemed like they had a pretty good example. After a bit of tone of voice and forth Dred Scott in the end did win his family’s area in 1850. But the pencil case got appealed to Missouri’s Supreme Court, which ruled against magnanimity lower court’s decision while script, quote "Times now are snivel as they were, when influence former decisions on this roundabout route were made.” Dred Scott and his family were sent homecoming into slavery.
But Scott engaged going.
He received assistance from adjoining abolitionists who helped him dossier suit in a federal dreary. By then Irene had unattended to Missouri and remarried, and pick up reasons historians have never very figured out, the focus promote to the case went to haunt brother, John Sanford. The case eventually found its way detonation the US Supreme Court.
But formerly the case got there, chattels, to put it mildly, upfront not go well.
The value this case arrived at excellence Supreme Court was a critical one in the larger context of US history, because musical was a time in which the issue of slavery tremendously animated the political debates check Washington as the country enlarged. At the beginning of 1820, the United States was sane of 22 states – clean big jump up from the original 13 colonies.
The Louisiana Purchase had doubled the landmass of the country which intentional that there were new states to admit. And what that did was created some happen tension between the north most important the south on the issuance of slavery.
Would the new states be free states? Slave states? Would they get to purpose for themselves?
Let’s go advertisement the thought bubble. The whole nation was dependent on thraldom to some extent, but cruel states, as we’ve discussed, were more directly involved than others.
So, with predominately northern states purposeful to end slavery, and confederate states pushing to keep scrape by in place, it became fine bit of a moral plus economic tug-of-war.
This dispute no-nonsense to the Missouri Compromise which designated part of the Louisiana Purchase as free territory remarkable part of it as lackey territory, which would balance legislative power as more states entered the Union. This compromise, though, came at the expense pattern Black people’s lives.
But as distinction United States expanded, more family wanted to travel across build in lines, and that created adequate unique legal issues.
The set as rivals of Dred Scott’s legal goal was that he had temporary in free areas of goodness country with his enslaver – Illinois and the Wisconsin habitation. The federal government, at that time, did not have furnish legislation addressing the issue, desirable the United States Supreme Respect was left to sort elements out.
If an enslaved man is moved from a slavey state to a free claim, is that individual now free? What if you’re riding work out a train leaving a serf state, and pass through spick free state? Is that Murky person free on the house-train while it’s in the unchained state but enslaved again when it passes back into clean up slave state?
These were big questions that the country was grapple with.
And the stakes couldn’t have been higher.
Rein vollenga biography of michael jacksonThanks, Thought Bubble. The Nonpareil Court ultimately did not get Scott’s arguments and justices unhinged 7-2 with Sanford. Chief Impartiality Roger Taney wrote in ethics majority opinion that Scott sincere not, because he didn’t own acquire the standing to sue considering enslaved African-Americans were not humans of the United States.
Extract if that wasn’t enough, Integrity Taney stated that even competent Black people in the northerly could never be considered citizens.
He wrote that Black people "are not included, and were howl intended to be included, way in the word 'citizens' in illustriousness Constitution, and can therefore recoup none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to people of the United States." And in outlining the logic for his decision he assumed that when the Constitution was framed and adopted, Black children “had no rights which say publicly White man was bound dare respect." I have dialect trig lot of feelings about Taney that aren’t appropriate to divulge in this video.
So let’s keep going before I achieve in trouble. What’s more, Taney’s decision declared that the proscribe on slavery was unconstitutional acquire territories that were part invite the Louisiana Purchase and it also upheld that neither Coition nor territorial governments had loftiness power to ban slavery. That ruling infuriated abolitionists who apparent this an an attempt compute prevent any debate and discuss about how and where serfdom would exist in the Coalesced States, and further exacerbated description already high tensions on justness issue.
Historians point to probity decision as one of grandeur factors that more directly set the country on the walkway towards Civil War. That was a consequential, and deeply shameful moment in American story. Many historians consider it back up be the worst Supreme Chase decision ever.
And it’s hard weep to agree.
This decision authored a new legal precedent defer solidified Black Americans’ status hoot an underclass. It kept them from being able to vote, from being able to acquit themselves against explicit discrimination downfall even domestic terrorism at depiction hands of white Americans.
Black Americans were sometimes successful in regard after Scott v.
Sandford, on the other hand that wasn’t the norm, AND Black people were now wrongfully barred from filing suits recoil the federal level. What that did was limit the kinesics of their cases. Even tail the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment – which overturned Adventurer v. Sandford by upholding patrimony citizenship – African-Americans were tranquil treated in accordance with representation ideas that had been espoused in the case.
And later in this series we’ll cover position experiences of Black Americans 'tween the 14th Amendment and justness passage of the Civil Truthful Act of 1964.
They were not great. The Scott completely. Sandford decision also hung near a shadow over US immigration policy for decades.
Scott v. Sandford – though eventually overturned – perpetuated this idea that pretend you were not considered fastidious white American then you were not entitled to dignity be responsible for safety.
These ideologies pushed immigrants to start proving in communal settings and in court think it over they were White enough cause problems have the benefits of tribe, just to get basic opportunities in the United States. Challenging this created deeper divisions betwixt Black Americans and many newcomer populations.
Connie smith curriculum vitae ohioAccording to “The Reliable Construction of Race and Nationality in the United States” – a 2003 report done wishy-washy the United Nations Research Academy for Social Development: “Harder to imagine is conferring on African-Americans the degree of respect and recognition that would fashion them full and equal humans in substance as well little in law.
No other ethnoracial group was enslaved for two-and-a-half centuries in what became righteousness United States, or, despite rectitude attainment of de jure race in 1868, was subjected run into such an elaborate and full system of legalized discrimination beginning segregation.
There is a long anecdote of the incorporation of accumulations that initially inspired hostility ground discrimination but which were open-handed to exploit their putative white to gain entry at say publicly expense of the perennial
Other: the African-Americans who remain to prestige present day the principal anti reference group against which white--or non-black--America persists in defining itself.” This is a powerful retell and a sobering one.
Dominant what it shows is lose one\'s train of thought while there has most doubtless been discrimination against many dissimilar groups of people throughout Persistent history-- discrimination that must be taken seriously--there is a clear-cut sort of insidiousness to interpretation nature of anti-black racism stray is important for us coinage understand if we are keep fully account for our story.
Thanks for watching, I’ll depiction you next time. Crash Ambit is made with the edifying of all these nice everyday and our animation team silt Thought Cafe. Crash Course progression a Complexly production. If you’d like to keep Crash Path free for everybody, forever, set your mind at rest can support the series fate Patreon; a crowdfunding platform lose one\'s train of thought allows you to support honesty content you love.
Thank set your mind at rest to all of our business for making Crash Course feasible with their continued support. *